One of the aspects of working with rare books that I
particularly enjoy is that I can pick up what initially looks like an
unassuming early printed book only for copy-specific information to be revealed
on closer inspection: annotations in different hands; evidence of rebinding;
and traces of how the book has been used and valued over time. What seems
straightforward can turn out to be layered, complex, and deeply revealing.
Assessing a CILIP Professional Registration portfolio is
similar. On the surface, you’re presented with a set of experiences and
examples –
but what really matters is how those experiences are interpreted, reflected on,
and understood.
For many people working towards CILIP Professional
Registration, the process can feel overwhelming. As a Professional Registration
Support Officer (PRSO), and as an assessor, I’ve seen first-hand how candidates
approach their portfolios, what works well, and where people sometimes get
stuck.
Whilst there is no single ‘right’ way to assemble your
portfolio, there are consistent characteristics of strong submissions – as
well as some common pitfalls.
In this post, I want to share a few insights from the
assessor side of the process that will hopefully make it feel less daunting,
and more achievable.
It’s not about the role
Successful submissions come from library and information
professionals from across all sectors and from a wide variety of roles. What
matters is how you understand your role in a wider professional context,
reflect on your work and its impact, and demonstrate professional growth over
time.
The PKSB is a tool, not a checklist
A good place to start your Professional Registration journey
is with the Professional Knowledge and Skills Base (PKSB). Some candidates try
to ‘tick off’ as many areas as possible, but a focused, selective approach is far
more valuable. Aim to assess yourself against 10-12 PKSB areas and remember
that ‘ethics and values’ can be one of them.
Strong candidates tend to:
·
Engage meaningfully with relevant areas
·
Show how their knowledge connects across domains
· Use the PKSB as a framework for reflection, rather than a checklist
Reflective writing is key to success
A frequent pitfall is focusing too heavily on describing
tasks:
·
“I wrote a blog post”
·
“I delivered an information literacy session”
·
“I supported students with enquiries”
All of that matters – but description alone
isn’t enough. Assessors are looking for evidence of:
·
Why you did something
·
How it made you feel
·
What you learned
·
What you would do differently next time
·
What impact it had (on users, colleagues,
services)
There are various reflective models that you could follow
and it’s worth taking a bit of time to find out about them, try them out, and
find what works for you. Examples include STAR (Situation, Task, Action, Result)
and the often used What? So what? What now? structure. And the good news is
that being able to talk about what you’ve done in this structured, reflective
way isn’t just for Professional Registration – it can be a useful way
to articulate your skills and development in appraisals and job interviews too.
The most compelling portfolios feel authentic. They show a
real person engaging with their practice. A strong submission often includes:
·
Honest reflection on challenges
·
Recognition of areas for development
·
Clear plans for future growth
Assessors are not looking for perfection – we’re
looking for self-awareness and progression. It’s entirely valid to say:
·
“I found this difficult”
·
“I didn’t get this right the first time”
·
“This is an area I’m still developing”
In fact, those reflections often make for some of the
strongest sections of a portfolio.
To evidence (verb)
Strong portfolios go beyond describing activity and
instead demonstrate impact. This doesn’t need to be dramatic or large-scale.
Impact can be:
·
Improving a process
·
Supporting a user more effectively
·
Contributing to a team outcome
·
Developing your own confidence or expertise
What matters is making that impact visible.
Rather than thinking of ‘evidence’ as a noun, think
of it as something you actively do. Your role may not always offer
opportunities to lead projects or influence policy – and that’s absolutely
fine. Instead, focus on your contributions.
Ask yourself:
- What difference did my work make?
- How did it support my service?
- How did it contribute to wider organisational aims?
Assessors aren’t just looking for what you did –
they’re looking for what changed as a result.
Clear signposting
As you build your submission, keep the assessors
firmly in mind. They need to understand your professional development quickly
and easily.
A well-structured, clearly signposted portfolio
makes a significant difference. Consider:
- Structuring your submission around the three assessment criteria
- Using clear headings and consistent labelling
- Including internal links or cross-references between pieces of
evidence
Clarity is key. Aim to write concisely and avoid
unnecessary detail. A thoughtful structure will help your strongest evidence
stand out.
It can also be invaluable to ask a critical friend
to review your portfolio. A fresh pair of eyes can quickly identify where your
argument isn’t as clear as you think.
Remember: organising information and communicating
effectively are core library and information skills. Your portfolio is an
opportunity to demonstrate both.
Read and understand the assessment criteria
When submissions are unsuccessful, a common reason is
limited engagement with the assessment criteria.
The criteria are clearly set out in the guidebooks for each
level of Professional Registration, and they should underpin everything you
include. Take time to:
·
Read the criteria carefully – and
more than once
·
Break them down into manageable components
·
Map your evidence explicitly against them
Don’t assume that assessors will infer how your evidence
meets the criteria – you need to make those connections visible.
A strong submission shows not only that you have developed
professionally, but that you understand how your development aligns with the
standards of the profession.
Final thoughts
CILIP Professional Registration is not about proving that
you’re perfect - it’s about demonstrating that you are:
·
Reflective
·
Developing
·
Translating learning into practice
·
Engaged with the profession
If you’re considering starting your journey, or are partway
through, my main advice is: reflect honestly, and don’t underestimate the value
–
and relevance – of your own experience.
Get involved
If you’re based in the North East, the CILIP regional network is here to support you – whether you’re just starting to think about Professional Registration or are ready to submit. Joining the committee, or coming along to one of our events, are excellent ways of building skills, knowledge and awareness of the wider profession.
- Melanie Wood, Professional Registration Support Officer (PRSO)




